Report on the Quality Assurance Audit 2000
January 29, 2001
Executive Summary
The promotion of continuing competence among the membership is an integral
part of the College of Nurses of Ontarios (CNO) Quality Assurance
(QA) Program. In response to legislative and Regulatory requirements,
the QA Program has implemented a Reflective Practice component which provides
opportunities for nurses to address areas requiring improvement. In doing
so, the program requires that all members complete a self-assessment,
obtain peer feedback and develop, implement and evaluate a learning plan.
Members are also required to maintain written documentation of their participation
in Reflective Practice. As a statutory body, the QA Committee is required
to ensure that nurses are participating in the QA Program.
In fulfilling this monitoring function, the QA Committee directed CNO
staff to conduct a mandatory audit of 2,500 members. The main objectives
of the Audit are to validate participation in Reflective Practice and
to obtain feedback on the benefits and effectiveness of participating
in the program. Results will also be used to inform evaluation activity
insofar as the limitations associated with the absence of anonymity are
considered.
In general, the findings show:
- A significant number of nurses identify the purpose of the program
as promoting continuous lifelong learning as well as helping nurses
remain competent. Results show that 69.8% believe the QA Program is
effective in enhancing the quality of practice.
-
A significant number of nurses are participating and meeting the
requirements of the Reflective Practice program. More specifically,
the majority of nurses are maintaining written documentation of their
self-assessment, peer feedback and learning plans, with 69.7% maintaining
records of all three steps. Results also suggest that maintaining
documentation is a positive step toward following through on the learning
plan.
-
The majority of nurses report benefiting from completing a self-assessment,
obtaining peer feedback and implementing a learning plan. Completing
a self-assessment and developing a learning plan are perceived to
be more difficult than obtaining peer feedback. However, nurses still
report some discomfort when approaching peers for feedback, especially
when the peer is a friend.
-
Identifying strengths. (90% specified a strength). While the
self-assessment and peer feedback processes are assisting nurses to
identify their strengths, nurses appear to have familiarity with their
strengths regardless of conducting a formal self-assessment and peer
feedback. There are several similarities in terms of the strengths
resulting from self-assessment and peer feedback. Examples include
communication skills and a strong interest in client care.
-
Identifying learning needs. (82.6% and 68.4% specified a learning
need from self-assessment and peer feedback, respectively). The self-assessment
and peer feedback processes are used to assist nurses identify learning
needs. However, similar to the previous finding on identifying strengths,
findings show that self-assessment and peer feedback are not providing
nurses with new information about learning gaps. This suggests that
self-assessment and peer feedback serve to corroborate areas in which
nurses have already identified as learning needs. Learning needs tend
to relate to job knowledge, enhancing computer skills and communication
skills.
-
Developing learning plans. (89.0% specified a learning objective;
84.6% specified an outcome). For a significant number of nurses, learning
objectives are developed based on day-to-day reflection. This corroborates
previous findings and suggests that nurses are actively reflecting
in practice outside of the Reflective Practice program. The self-assessment
process is more likely to be used to identify learning objectives
than is peer feedback. This suggests that stronger linkages need to
be made between using peer feedback results and the learning plan.
In their comments, nurses suggest that forms or checklists be developed
to facilitate the peer feedback process.
-
The majority of nurses report having implemented the learning plan
(87.4%). In contrast to previous findings, a greater number of nurses
report not creating a learning plan prior to CNOs (43.8%). This
suggests self-assessment and peer feedback have a greater impact in
facilitating the development of a learning plan than identifying strengths
and needs. However, nurses report they refer to their learning plans
infrequently and suggest that reminders be published in Communiqué.
-
Impact on practice. (81.4% provided specific detail about
the impact). 88.8% of nurses evaluated their learning plans and 85.7%
report that their learning plan enhanced the quality of their practice.
When nurses were asked to describe how the learning improved or changed
their practices areas of impact include the acquisition of a new skill,
increased application of knowledge, change in delivery of care and
the ability to apply new knowledge in their practice.
-
Tools and resources. The Self-Assessment Tool is most commonly
used for self-assessment and peer feedback. The Professional Profile
ranks third after agency system options. The results from the self-assessment
are used by a significant proportion to create learning plans (84.6%).
Nurses rely on other people to assist in implementing learning plans.
In-services, journals and books are also popular resources.
The results are supportive of the Reflective Practice program. The findings
serve to validate participation among members to the degree that nurses
provided specific detail describing their participation in each step.
Findings will be also be used in evaluation to inform program indicators
and as a basis for planning evaluation activities.
[top] |